MSMG
Election Coverage | 2026 Live
← Back to News
Trump Doubles Down on Taking Greenland

Trump Doubles Down on Taking Greenland

news • 2026-01-20

Trump has doubled down on taking Greenland

President Donald Trump has doubled down on his intention to take Greenland.

In a series of social media posts and comments during a White House press briefing, Trump doubled down on his long-standing claim that Greenland is essential for American national security, citing its strategic Arctic position, vast mineral resources, and role in countering Russian and Chinese influence. "There can be no going back," he wrote in one post, while sharing private messages from French President Emmanuel Macron questioning the strategy and dismissing European pushback.

Asked directly how far he was willing to go to secure Greenland, Trump replied, "You'll find out," leaving open the possibility of economic or other pressure despite earlier threats of tariffs on Denmark and seven other NATO allies--including Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland--set to begin at 10% on February 1 and rise to 25% by June if no deal materialized. He had announced those duties on January 17, framing them as leverage until Denmark agreed to a "Complete and Total purchase" of the island.

The rhetoric escalated tensions within NATO, with Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen stating the territory and its people must prepare for "everything," including potential U.S. military action, though he emphasized self-determination and opposition to any forced transfer. Danish officials reiterated that Greenland is not for sale, while European leaders prepared joint statements affirming sovereignty over the territory belongs to its inhabitants.

Trump's comments came just ahead of his attendance at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where the issue dominated discussions among global leaders. He insisted the U.S. alone could protect Greenland effectively and reiterated demands for immediate negotiations, though he later clarified in related remarks that he preferred a deal over confrontation.

The episode drew sharp criticism from allies, who viewed the threats as damaging to transatlantic trust and NATO unity. Some analysts described it as classic negotiation tactics--starting with maximum pressure to extract concessions--while others warned it risked alienating partners at a time of heightened Arctic competition.

As of late February 2026, the standoff shifted after Trump's January 21 Davos speech, where he ruled out military force and withdrew the tariff threats following talks with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte that established a vague "framework" for future Arctic cooperation, including potential expanded U.S. access to bases and resources without full sovereignty transfer. Greenlandic and Danish leaders welcomed the de-escalation but maintained vigilance, with no final agreement reached and the territory's status unchanged.